Blade Runner 2049 (2017) Review

Spread the love

I watched Ana de Armas glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate

Blade Runner 2049 (2017): 9 out of 10: Blade Runner 2049 is a continuation of 1982’s Blade Runner, a seemingly impossible task. Against all odds and logic, the movie pulls it off.

The Good

The Good: The greatest thing about the sequel is the story. Without delving into spoiler territory, Blade Runner 2049 concludes with an ending that works with an internal logical sense and yet still surprises. There are so many good decisions throughout this production that one could hardly list them all.

Keeping the cold war and old Iconic brands from the first movie works brilliantly and the overall look and feel of this movie are timeless. Blade Runner 2049 does not pigeonhole its narrative into the concerns of today. It does not wink at the fears of today’s audience. It is its own self-contained universe telling a story that will work fifty years from now and would have worked just as strongly fifty years ago.

The acting is strong across the board with Harrison Ford appearing as if he wants to be in the film (and looking fit to boot). Also, Ana de Armas needs to be in every movie moving forward. A star-making turn.

The Bad

The Bad: A combination of a long running time, a leisurely pace and a soundtrack from a health spa can put one in a catatonic state if one is not careful. I confess a strong ending brought me back into the film. It was losing me for a while there.

In Conclusion

In Conclusion: This movie sticks to the ribs after viewing. It seemed even better in retrospect than during the actual viewing (see leisurely pace above). Blade Runner 2049 pulls off effortlessly decisions that could seem disastrous in other films (Jared Leto). In many ways, it is better than the first film and better than it had any right to be. A triumph.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments